Report effective bulk command permissions

[BenCodez]

Summary

• derive /av perms bulk entries from AdvancedCore PlayerCommandHandler metadata for both /vote and /av handlers
• show each ordinary permission with a labelled additional all-target permission and effective access for the inspected player
• register bulk nodes as default-false without making them children of ordinary permissions
• preserve the negative bulk AddPoints safeguard and apply the existing administrator-override policy consistently

Examples include VotingPlugin.Commands.AdminVote.SetPoints.All, VotingPlugin.Commands.AdminVote.AddPoints.All, and VotingPlugin.Commands.AdminVote.RemovePoints.All. Base-only staff retain named-player access but require the matching .All node for bulk actions; VotingPlugin.Admin remains the configured full-admin override when multiple-permission checks are enabled.

Depends on and is coordinated with AdvancedCore #316.

Validation

• built AdvancedCore Single command for vote party #316 into isolated Maven repository /root/.cache/codex-m2/player-all-permissions/repository
• mvn -o -B -Dmaven.repo.local=/root/.cache/codex-m2/player-all-permissions/repository clean package (619 tests, 0 failures/errors; BUILD SUCCESS; shaded JAR)
• verified the shaded VotingPlugin JAR contains the relocated AdvancedCore PlayerCommandHandler APIs runCommand, hasAllPermission, getAdditionalPermissions, and withAllPermissionOverrides
• git diff --check
• independent final review: No findings

Coverage includes sender, named-player, console, pagination, developer output, multiple handlers, admin-policy modes, wrong/base-only permissions, dynamic registration, and negative AddPoints.

Ordering

Merge and publish AdvancedCore #316 first, then update/build this PR against that released artifact before merging. No deployment is included.

AI assistance was used for implementation and review; the complete diff was independently source-reviewed and validated locally.

Compatibility note: the source compiles against the currently published snapshot so pre-release CI can run, but command registration fails closed at runtime if the secure AdvancedCore #316 bulk API is absent. Deployment therefore requires #316 first. Final candidate JAR SHA-256: 3988ce70ad034785a12dcfbcdd939c6857e20fbfe7f6453fd6b180a00c4cf092.

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review	Status	Commit	Review trigger
📝 Code Review	✅ Completed 2026-09-10T15:48:35.865413Z	5d29a7c	Manual request
🔒 Security Review	✅ Completed 2026-09-10T04:09:59.901855Z	6472e66	PR opened

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

[BenCodez]

@codex review

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Nice work!

Reviewed commit: 5d29a7cee2

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

[BenCodez]

@codex review

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Can't wait for the next one!

Reviewed commit: 5d29a7cee2

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

[BenCodez]

@codex review

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. 🎉

Reviewed commit: 5d29a7cee2

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

[BenCodez]

@codex review

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. What shall we delve into next?

Reviewed commit: 5d29a7cee2

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".