Rocky clones don't have the same set of linked data that the Red Had source advisories have. One specific example from the community:
I notice a slight difference in the upstream errata and ours in this particular case...
Specifically, the upstream errata mentions a bug fix which is included in their errata (https://redhat.atlassian.net/browse/RHEL-154262) which our errata does not include.
We need to figure out if the CSAF data we read from Red Hat includes these types of links and what it would take for the RHMatcherWorkflow to preserve these links.
Rocky clones don't have the same set of linked data that the Red Had source advisories have. One specific example from the community:
We need to figure out if the CSAF data we read from Red Hat includes these types of links and what it would take for the RHMatcherWorkflow to preserve these links.