Conversation
42c95ea to
351e00d
Compare
8811f06 to
0253192
Compare
|
PR-cycle state — maintained automatically. Do not edit. {
"approval": {
"approved_revision_fingerprint": null,
"evidence_fingerprint": null
},
"checks": {
"conclusion": "pending",
"note": "re-running after each rewrite"
},
"delivery_deferrals": [],
"findings": [
{
"evidence": ".changes/unreleased/portable-tool-delivery-plan.yaml present in every reviewed head since e473525e4668; reviewer link cites the original head 02531926e475",
"id": "changelog-fragment",
"status": "verified non-actionable"
}
],
"pull_request": {
"base": {
"ref": "pr82",
"sha": "17c7dbbbd2a99e583ada4512bff709ac6f661198"
},
"head": {
"ref": "pr86",
"sha": "fcf5d0aa753acae664671d06dcdc210e6b9b313c"
},
"number": 86,
"repository": "github.com/omry/reploy"
},
"revision_fingerprint": "sha256:30674683b65e9cf1f1f963b71fafe21b115c1c1bfe7571792b2fba66fda480b5",
"rounds": [
{
"attempt": 1,
"dispositions": "all applied: PTD-09 candidate selection, changelog fragment, PTD-08 destination-conflict scope, flat-format timing",
"findings": 4,
"reviewed_head": "02531926e475"
},
{
"attempt": 2,
"dispositions": "PTD-17 lock provenance applied; changelog finding verified non-actionable (fragment present since e473525e4668)",
"findings": 2,
"reviewed_head": "742ba53c3ea3"
},
{
"attempt": 3,
"dispositions": "PTD-09 opaque default applied; changelog finding verified non-actionable for the third time, reacted \ud83d\udc4e",
"findings": 2,
"reviewed_head": "3f5af633c1af"
}
],
"scope_authority": {
"docs/PORTABLE_TOOL_DEFINITION_DESIGN.md": "sha256:a7acc70b0b1e390cd4d7d0e60b0f30e6a17500f6a12828195d4b5e8d083ff536",
"docs/PORTABLE_TOOL_DEFINITION_IMPLEMENTATION_PLAN.md": "sha256:7152cf3b12cc3696a273854b268390f2ae9553fba7bfe5f326cb3cf5b974cdf6"
},
"version": 4
} |
|
You have reached your Codex usage limits for security reviews. Please try again later. |
|
Review request declined by the connector: "You have reached your Codex usage limits for security reviews." No attributable current-head review result exists, so this PR returns to draft and its PR-cycle run is paused, resumable at head |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 02531926e4
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
|
@codex, regular review |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 02531926e4
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: e473525e46
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 742ba53c3e
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
|
@codex, regular review 3f5af63 Note on the repeated changelog finding: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 3f5af633c1
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: fcf5d0aa75
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 7084147ce4
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 676083026a
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 0c34f07644
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
Add a dependency-ordered delivery plan for completing the accepted portable tool definition design through reviewable Java and Playwright slices. Define the preparation gates that retire the oversized PR 83 and PR 85 work into parked extraction sources, and link the plan from the normative design without changing its decisions.
Add a dependency-ordered delivery plan for completing the accepted portable tool definition design through reviewable Java and Playwright slices.
Define the preparation gates that retire the oversized PR 83 and PR 85 work into parked extraction sources, and link the plan from the normative design without changing its decisions.
Scope authority
Intent: establish
docs/PORTABLE_TOOL_DEFINITION_IMPLEMENTATION_PLAN.mdas the delivery authority for tasks PTD-01 through PTD-24 under the normative Portable Tool Definition Design.Acceptance criteria:
nox -s docs-buildpasses.Exclusions: no implementation code, no record schemas, no catalog behavior, and no change to the accepted design's decisions. Superseded PRs #83 and #85 are closed; their content is parked locally and delivered later as PTD-01 through PTD-11.