Skip to content

[License]: Confirming our use is MIT-compliant — can we proceed? #1066

Open

Description

@K2m8

Describe the feature that you would like added

Hi team,

We'd like to use Fluent UI System Icons in our application under the MIT License.

Our setup:

  • SVG icons stored alongside the MIT LICENSE file
  • Attribution listed in the app's license/about page only
    (not embedded in each individual generated output)
  • Icons may be resized or recolored to fit our UI
  • Use case includes potential commercial distribution

We believe this is fully compliant with the MIT License, but our legal team has requested that we obtain formal confirmation before proceeding.
Would you be able to confirm whether this approach is acceptable?

Thanks for the great work on this project!

Additional context

No response

Have you discussed this feature with our team

Jason Custer (@jasoncuster) spencer-nelson Joe Woodward (@thewoodpecker)

Validations

  • Check that there isn't already an issue that requests the same feature to avoid creating a duplicate.

Priority

High

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    enhancementNew feature or request

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions