H-6609: Remove hash-backend-load, updates for uuid vuln

[CiaranMn]

🌟 What is the purpose of this PR?

We have a package hash-backend-load that was used earlier for load testing.

We're not really using it at the moment, and artillery is pulling in lots of dependencies that need maintenance.

This PR removes the package, and makes some other small dependency updates to address vulnerabilities in uuid.

This doesn't remove all the old uuid, but some dependencies haven't yet updated. I will revisit again tomorrow, but this is a start with the ones that are less messy.

Pre-Merge Checklist 🚀

🚢 Has this modified a publishable library?

This PR:

• does not modify any publishable blocks or libraries, or modifications do not need publishing

📜 Does this require a change to the docs?

The changes in this PR:

• are internal and do not require a docs change

🕸️ Does this require a change to the Turbo Graph?

The changes in this PR:

• do not affect the execution graph

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project	Deployment	Actions	Updated (UTC)
hash	Ready	Preview, Comment	Jun 19, 2026 9:55pm
hashdotdesign-tokens	Ready	Preview, Comment	Jun 19, 2026 9:55pm
petrinaut	Ready	Preview, Comment	Jun 19, 2026 9:55pm

[cursor]

PR Summary

Medium Risk
Temporal 1.12→1.18 is a large jump on workflow workers and the API client; validate deploys and workflow compatibility. Removing load tests and slonik only affects unused code paths.

Overview
Removes the unused @tests/hash-backend-load Artillery load-test workspace (scenarios, tracing helpers, and related turbo tasks) to cut maintenance on heavy transitive dependencies.

Alongside that cleanup, Temporal packages are upgraded from 1.12.1 → 1.18.1 across API, workers, graph SDK, and backend utils. Smaller bumps include @google-cloud/storage, @snowplow/node-tracker, and natural.

slonik and libs/@local/hash-backend-utils/src/postgres.ts are dropped with the load package (no remaining callers). Root resolutions add bull/uuid and @temporalio/proto/protobufjs to steer transitive uuid / protobuf versions toward safer releases.

^{Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 785cdc6. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.}

[github-actions]

Dependency Review

The following issues were found:

• ❌ 1 vulnerable package(s)
• ✅ 0 package(s) with incompatible licenses
• ✅ 0 package(s) with invalid SPDX license definitions
• ✅ 0 package(s) with unknown licenses.
• ⚠️ 1 packages with OpenSSF Scorecard issues.

View full job summary

[Copilot]

Pull request overview

This PR removes the unused @tests/hash-backend-load load-testing package (and its Artillery/OpenTelemetry setup) to reduce dependency maintenance, and applies dependency updates intended to address uuid-related vulnerabilities (plus a few other version bumps).

Changes:

• Removed the entire tests/hash-backend-load workspace (configs, scripts, scenarios, and source).
• Updated Temporal dependencies across multiple packages to 1.18.1 (plus a few other dependency bumps).
• Removed the slonik-based Postgres pool helper from @local/hash-backend-utils and dropped the slonik dependency.

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 40 out of 41 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.

Show a summary per file

File	Description
tests/hash-backend-load/turbo.json	Removed turbo task configuration for the deleted load-testing workspace.
tests/hash-backend-load/tsconfig.json	Removed TS config for the deleted load-testing workspace.
tests/hash-backend-load/tsconfig.build.json	Removed build TS config for the deleted load-testing workspace.
tests/hash-backend-load/src/types.ts	Removed shared Artillery hook/type definitions for the deleted load-testing workspace.
tests/hash-backend-load/src/tracing/sdk.ts	Removed OpenTelemetry SDK wiring used by the load tests.
tests/hash-backend-load/src/tracing/request.ts	Removed per-request span injection hooks used by the load tests.
tests/hash-backend-load/src/main.ts	Removed package entrypoint exporting Artillery processors/hooks.
tests/hash-backend-load/src/graph/user.ts	Removed Graph helper used by load-test scenarios.
tests/hash-backend-load/src/graph/api.ts	Removed Graph API client setup used by load tests.
tests/hash-backend-load/src/authentication/session.ts	Removed Kratos session refresh hook used by load tests.
tests/hash-backend-load/src/authentication/registration.ts	Removed signup/registration flow helpers used by load tests.
tests/hash-backend-load/src/authentication/reauthenticate.ts	Removed reauth logic used by load tests.
tests/hash-backend-load/src/authentication/kratos.ts	Removed Kratos client setup/types used by load tests.
tests/hash-backend-load/scripts/test.sh	Removed integration test runner script for Artillery scenarios.
tests/hash-backend-load/scenarios/register.yml	Removed Artillery “Register” scenario.
tests/hash-backend-load/scenarios/read-property-types.yml	Removed Artillery scenario for reading property types.
tests/hash-backend-load/scenarios/read-property-types-value-property-refs.yml	Removed Artillery scenario variant for deeper references.
tests/hash-backend-load/scenarios/read-property-types-property-refs.yml	Removed Artillery scenario variant for property references.
tests/hash-backend-load/scenarios/read-entity-types.yml	Removed Artillery scenario for reading entity types.
tests/hash-backend-load/scenarios/read-entity-types-value-property-entity-refs.yml	Removed Artillery scenario variant for deeper type references.
tests/hash-backend-load/scenarios/read-entity-types-property-entity-refs.yml	Removed Artillery scenario variant for type refs.
tests/hash-backend-load/scenarios/read-entity-types-parents.yml	Removed Artillery scenario variant for parents.
tests/hash-backend-load/scenarios/read-entity-types-entity-refs.yml	Removed Artillery scenario variant for entity refs.
tests/hash-backend-load/scenarios/read-data-types.yml	Removed Artillery scenario for reading data types.
tests/hash-backend-load/scenarios/ontology-read.yml	Removed Artillery scenario for ontology read queries.
tests/hash-backend-load/scenarios/flow.yml	Removed Artillery scenario for “flow run” style load.
tests/hash-backend-load/rollup.config.ts	Removed bundling configuration for the deleted load-testing workspace.
tests/hash-backend-load/package.json	Removed workspace manifest for the deleted load-testing workspace.
tests/hash-backend-load/LICENSE.md	Removed workspace-local license file with the deleted package.
tests/hash-backend-load/eslint.config.js	Removed workspace-local ESLint config with the deleted package.
tests/hash-backend-load/artillery.yml	Removed Artillery config with the deleted package.
package.json	Added a resolutions entry intended to address uuid vulnerability exposure.
libs/@local/hash-isomorphic-utils/package.json	Bumped @temporalio/workflow to 1.18.1.
libs/@local/hash-backend-utils/src/postgres.ts	Removed Slonik-based Postgres pool helper implementation.
libs/@local/hash-backend-utils/package.json	Bumped Temporal packages to 1.18.1, removed slonik.
libs/@local/graph/sdk/typescript/package.json	Bumped @temporalio/client to 1.18.1.
apps/hash-integration-worker/package.json	Bumped Temporal packages to 1.18.1.
apps/hash-api/package.json	Bumped @temporalio/* to 1.18.1 and updated @snowplow/node-tracker.
apps/hash-ai-worker-ts/package.json	Bumped Temporal packages to 1.18.1 and updated @google-cloud/storage.
.claude/hooks/package.json	Bumped natural patch version.

---

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 59.09%. Comparing base (fbfcb98) to head (785cdc6).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #8889   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   59.08%   59.09%           
=======================================
  Files        1347     1346    -1     
  Lines      130513   130507    -6     
  Branches     5906     5906           
=======================================
- Hits        77118    77117    -1     
+ Misses      52490    52485    -5     
  Partials      905      905           

Flag	Coverage Δ
apps.hash-api	0.00% <ø> (ø)
blockprotocol.type-system	40.84% <ø> (ø)
local.harpc-client	51.49% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-backend-utils	2.82% <ø> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
local.hash-graph-sdk	9.63% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-isomorphic-utils	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.antsi	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.error-stack	90.87% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-codec	84.70% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-net	96.18% <ø> (-0.02%)	⬇️
rust.harpc-tower	67.03% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-types	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-wire-protocol	92.23% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-codec	72.76% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-api	2.52% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-authorization	62.34% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-postgres-store	26.78% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-store	37.76% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-temporal-versioning	47.95% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-types	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-validation	83.43% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-ast	87.23% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-compiletest	28.24% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-core	79.60% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-diagnostics	72.31% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-eval	75.69% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-hir	89.06% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-mir	87.05% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-syntax-jexpr	94.04% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[codspeed-hq]

Merging this PR will not alter performance

✅ 80 untouched benchmarks

---

_{Comparing cm/remove-backend-load-and-uuid-updates (785cdc6) with main (439081a)}

[github-actions]

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2002	$$27.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 163 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.021 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.51 \mathrm{ms} \pm 23.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.35 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1001	$$12.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 97.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.443 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 3314	$$42.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 318 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.163 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$14.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 162 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.11 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 1526	$$24.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 227 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.19 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 2078	$$28.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 259 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.59 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.79 \mathrm{ms} \pm 21.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.847 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 1033	$$13.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 140 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.542 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_medium

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 102	$$3.81 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.777 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.03 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.016 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 51	$$3.41 \mathrm{ms} \pm 31.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.836 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 269	$$5.19 \mathrm{ms} \pm 27.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.215 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.54 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.259 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 107	$$4.15 \mathrm{ms} \pm 23.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.696 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 133	$$4.43 \mathrm{ms} \pm 29.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.817 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.48 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.795 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 63	$$4.10 \mathrm{ms} \pm 21.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.079 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_none

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2	$$2.65 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.750 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.51 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.760 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1	$$2.59 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.372 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 8	$$2.89 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.910 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.65 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.151 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 3	$$2.84 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.642 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_small

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 52	$$3.05 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.004 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.77 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.979 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 25	$$3.00 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.610 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 94	$$3.48 \mathrm{ms} \pm 33.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.43 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.96 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.133 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 26	$$3.30 \mathrm{ms} \pm 21.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.728 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 66	$$3.40 \mathrm{ms} \pm 31.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.64 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.94 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.056 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 29	$$3.33 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.027 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_complete

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id;one_depth	1 entities	$$54.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 392 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.621 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	10 entities	$$46.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 247 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.911 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	25 entities	$$50.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 368 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.676 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	5 entities	$$45.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 320 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.85 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	50 entities	$$63.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 514 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.13 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	1 entities	$$62.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 515 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.622 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	10 entities	$$57.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 468 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.55 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	25 entities	$$104 \mathrm{ms} \pm 698 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.877 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	5 entities	$$46.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 251 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.942 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	50 entities	$$325 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.26 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{red}19.2 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	1 entities	$$19.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 127 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-8.169 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	10 entities	$$20.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 125 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.184 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	25 entities	$$20.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 130 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.498 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	5 entities	$$19.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 140 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.525 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	50 entities	$$25.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 165 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.541 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$19.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 158 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.050 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$19.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 126 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.108 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$19.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 123 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.112 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$20.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 133 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.348 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$26.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 213 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.595 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1	$$35.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 304 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-7.666 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1	$$34.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 313 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.667 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1	$$34.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 299 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.590 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1	$$33.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 297 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.125 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2	$$35.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 316 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.137 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1	$$34.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 319 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.043 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1	$$34.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 320 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.869 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1	$$34.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 291 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.739 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1	$$33.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 363 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.219 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: bf5a9ef5-dc3b-43cf-a291-6210c0321eba	$$8.71 \mathrm{ms} \pm 46.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.754 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$92.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 605 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.059 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$148 \mathrm{ms} \pm 803 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.076 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$100 \mathrm{ms} \pm 706 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.216 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$111 \mathrm{ms} \pm 535 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.926 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$118 \mathrm{ms} \pm 696 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.045 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$127 \mathrm{ms} \pm 631 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.870 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$103 \mathrm{ms} \pm 611 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.279 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$134 \mathrm{ms} \pm 857 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.363 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$110 \mathrm{ms} \pm 552 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.282 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$120 \mathrm{ms} \pm 675 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.134 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$121 \mathrm{ms} \pm 717 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.765 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$122 \mathrm{ms} \pm 939 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.451 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$

scenarios

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
full_test	query-limited	$$185 \mathrm{ms} \pm 940 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}23.8 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
full_test	query-unlimited	$$149 \mathrm{ms} \pm 673 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.944 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-limited	$$40.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 261 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.675 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-unlimited	$$558 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.15 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}-1.869 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph