perf: short-circuit identical address comparison - #331
Open
BobTheBuidler wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What I did
Added a fast path for exact address matches in
is_same_address().fixes: N/A
How I did it
The function still validates both inputs first. If the validated inputs are exactly equal, it returns
Truebefore normalizing both addresses for comparison.How to verify it
Run
python -m pytest tests/core/address-utils/test_address_utils.py,tox -e py310-core, andtox -e py310-lint.Local microbench for
is_same_address(addr, addr):4.11 usecper loop on upstream base,578 nsecper loop on this branch, about 7.1x faster for the exact-match path.Checklist