Skip to content

DX | 02-11-2026 | Release - #102

Merged
reeshika-h merged 11 commits into
masterfrom
development
Nov 2, 2026
Merged

reeshika-h merged 11 commits into
masterfrom
development

Conversation

@cs-raj

@cs-raj cs-raj commented Nov 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

Release PR: promotes development to master. The main change is DX-27614 — release.yml publishes to npm with OIDC trusted publishing (no NPM_TOKEN). It has to be on master, where releases are cut from.

What's included

  • OIDC trusted publishing in release.yml (chore(release): publish to npm with trusted publishing #99): runs on release: published, id-token: write, Node 24 and latest npm
  • Release workflow checks that the tag matches package.json and passes it via env
  • brace-expansion override raised to 5.0.12
  • Back-merge of master into development

Notes

  • package.json is still 2.1.14, so merging does not publish anything. Publishing needs a version bump and a GitHub release.
  • The npm trusted-publisher config is tracked in CLOUD-19945 / CLOUD-20184.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

harshithad0703 and others added 9 commits May 20, 2026 15:09
chore: back-merge master into development
chore: back-merge master into development
DX | 03-08-2026 | Release | Back-merge
Publish on release:published from release.yml so the npm trusted publisher can
be keyed on the filename, drop the NPM_TOKEN passed to JS-DevTools/npm-publish
in favour of id-token: write (OIDC), run on Node 24 with npm@latest (trusted
publishing needs npm >= 11.5.1), check out the release tag without persisted
credentials. The tarball is attached to the release from a separate job with
gh release upload instead of the archived upload-release-asset action. GitHub
pre-releases go to the beta dist-tag.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Refuse to publish when the release tag is not "v" + the package.json version,
so a tag cut on the wrong commit cannot publish an older version under a
newer tag. The tag now reaches the upload step through the RELEASE_TAG env
variable instead of being interpolated into the shell line (GitHub Actions
script-injection hardening).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
overrides.brace-expansion: 5.0.9 -> 5.0.12
Fixes SNYK-JS-BRACEEXPANSION-20244948, -20244950, -20244952 (via rimraf > glob > minimatch).
package-lock.json regenerated from a clean install.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
chore(release): publish to npm with trusted publishing
…development

chore: back-merge master into development
@cs-raj
cs-raj requested review from a team as code owners November 2, 2026 05:46
@snyk-io

snyk-io Bot commented Nov 2, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

✅ Snyk checks have passed. No issues have been found so far.

Status Scan Engine Critical High Medium Low Total (0)
✅ Open Source Security 0 0 0 0 0 issues
✅ Licenses 0 0 0 0 0 issues
✅ Code Security 0 0 0 0 0 issues

💻 Catch issues earlier using the plugins for VS Code, JetBrains IDEs, Visual Studio, and Eclipse.

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Nov 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔒 Security Scan Results

ℹ️ Note: Only vulnerabilities with available fixes (upgrades or patches) are counted toward thresholds.

Check Type Count (with fixes) Without fixes Threshold Result
🔴 Critical Severity 0 0 10 ✅ Passed
🟠 High Severity 0 0 25 ✅ Passed
🟡 Medium Severity 0 1 500 ✅ Passed
🔵 Low Severity 0 0 1000 ✅ Passed

⏱️ SLA Breach Summary

✅ No SLA breaches detected. All vulnerabilities are within acceptable time thresholds.

Severity Breaches (with fixes) Breaches (no fixes) SLA Threshold (with/no fixes) Status
🔴 Critical 0 0 15 / 30 days ✅ Passed
🟠 High 0 0 30 / 120 days ✅ Passed
🟡 Medium 0 0 90 / 365 days ✅ Passed
🔵 Low 0 0 180 / 365 days ✅ Passed

ℹ️ Vulnerabilities Without Available Fixes (Informational Only)

The following vulnerabilities were detected but do not have fixes available (no upgrade or patch). These are excluded from failure thresholds:

  • Critical without fixes: 0
  • High without fixes: 0
  • Medium without fixes: 1
  • Low without fixes: 0

✅ BUILD PASSED - All security checks passed

cs-raj and others added 2 commits November 2, 2026 12:45
development was at 2.1.14, but the last version published to npm is 2.1.11. 2.1.12 never reached npm (its release failed at the publish step) and 2.1.13 and 2.1.14 were bumped by Snyk-fix PRs without a release.

Set development to 2.1.12 so the next release is a single patch on top of 2.1.11.

- package.json / package-lock.json: version 2.1.14 -> 2.1.12
- package-lock.json: updates within existing ranges for @babel/{generator,helper-string-parser,parser,traverse,types}, baseline-browser-mapping, browserslist, caniuse-lite, electron-to-chromium, node-releases and ts-jest

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
chore: set version to 2.1.12 and refresh lock file
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Nov 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔒 Security Scan Results

ℹ️ Note: Only vulnerabilities with available fixes (upgrades or patches) are counted toward thresholds.

Check Type Count (with fixes) Without fixes Threshold Result
🔴 Critical Severity 0 0 10 ✅ Passed
🟠 High Severity 0 0 25 ✅ Passed
🟡 Medium Severity 0 1 500 ✅ Passed
🔵 Low Severity 0 0 1000 ✅ Passed

⏱️ SLA Breach Summary

✅ No SLA breaches detected. All vulnerabilities are within acceptable time thresholds.

Severity Breaches (with fixes) Breaches (no fixes) SLA Threshold (with/no fixes) Status
🔴 Critical 0 0 15 / 30 days ✅ Passed
🟠 High 0 0 30 / 120 days ✅ Passed
🟡 Medium 0 0 90 / 365 days ✅ Passed
🔵 Low 0 0 180 / 365 days ✅ Passed

ℹ️ Vulnerabilities Without Available Fixes (Informational Only)

The following vulnerabilities were detected but do not have fixes available (no upgrade or patch). These are excluded from failure thresholds:

  • Critical without fixes: 0
  • High without fixes: 0
  • Medium without fixes: 1
  • Low without fixes: 0

✅ BUILD PASSED - All security checks passed

@reeshika-h
reeshika-h merged commit fba6ab5 into master Nov 2, 2026
10 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants