Add --files alias for -f - #402
Open
markstos wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
Collaborator
|
Does it make sense to make one for -g as well? |
Author
I call YAGNI here-- So if anything, I'd go the opposite direction with |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Some justifications for adding --files an alias for
-f:--filesis more readable for scripting--filescould be easier to remember. Lot of CLI tools also use-ffor "force".rg. Even if you don't user ripgrep directly, it's a favorite choice of AI coding agents, so increasing number of people are seeingrgsyntax scroll by, including--files.--filesis unlikely to be used for anything other than an anliasfor
-fin the future, so it's likely forward-compatible, too.(I'm not suggesting adding any /further/ compatible with
rg, only that's nice to align new flags with /something/)