Skip to content

fix(eth): wait for peer registration in TestBroadcastBlock - #2509

Open
gzliudan wants to merge 1 commit into
XinFinOrg:dev-upgradefrom
gzliudan:fix-TestBroadcastBlock
Open

fix(eth): wait for peer registration in TestBroadcastBlock#2509
gzliudan wants to merge 1 commit into
XinFinOrg:dev-upgradefrom
gzliudan:fix-TestBroadcastBlock

Conversation

@gzliudan

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Proposed changes

Peers are registered into the peer set only after the protocol manager side of the handshake completes, so broadcasting right after newTestPeer returns could miss late peers and flake with fewer recipients than expected.

https://github.com/XinFinOrg/XDPoSChain/actions/runs/31360452080/job/93368159943

2026-08-10T06:03:22.9951436Z --- FAIL: TestBroadcastBlock (2.03s)
2026-08-10T06:03:22.9951975Z     handler_test.go:554: block broadcast to 2 peers, expected 3

Types of changes

What types of changes does your code introduce to XDC network?
Put an in the boxes that apply

  • build: Changes that affect the build system or external dependencies
  • ci: Changes to CI configuration files and scripts
  • chore: Changes that don't change source code or tests
  • docs: Documentation only changes
  • feat: A new feature
  • fix: A bug fix
  • perf: A code change that improves performance
  • refactor: A code change that neither fixes a bug nor adds a feature
  • revert: Revert something
  • style: Changes that do not affect the meaning of the code
  • test: Adding missing tests or correcting existing tests

Impacted Components

Which parts of the codebase does this PR touch?
Put an in the boxes that apply

  • Consensus
  • Account
  • Network
  • Geth
  • Smart Contract
  • External components
  • Not sure (Please specify below)

Checklist

Put an in the boxes once you have confirmed below actions (or provide reasons on not doing so) that

  • This PR has sufficient test coverage (unit/integration test) OR I have provided reason in the PR description for not having test coverage
  • Tested on a private network from the genesis block and monitored the chain operating correctly for multiple epochs.
  • Provide an end-to-end test plan in the PR description on how to manually test it on the devnet/testnet.
  • Tested the backwards compatibility.
  • Tested with XDC nodes running this version co-exist with those running the previous version.
  • Relevant documentation has been updated as part of this PR
  • N/A

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Aug 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 18c874c9-786d-4173-8315-b4eedf712e56

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@gzliudan
gzliudan force-pushed the fix-TestBroadcastBlock branch from f4f6776 to 8ede2dd Compare August 10, 2026 10:28
@gzliudan
gzliudan force-pushed the fix-TestBroadcastBlock branch from 8ede2dd to 3a89972 Compare August 11, 2026 09:10
Peers are registered into the peer set only after the protocol manager side
of the handshake completes, so broadcasting right after newTestPeer returns
could miss late peers and flake with fewer recipients than expected.
@gzliudan
gzliudan force-pushed the fix-TestBroadcastBlock branch from 3a89972 to f66786c Compare August 16, 2026 11:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants