Skip to content

Test V2 empty address and challenge trimming - #171

Merged
BenCodez merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
test/votifierplus-169-regression
Sep 8, 2026
Merged

BenCodez merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
test/votifierplus-169-regression

Conversation

@BenCodez

@BenCodez BenCodez commented Sep 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Adds focused regression coverage for the protocol behavior fixed by #169:\n\n- accepts an explicitly empty V2 address\n- trims trailing whitespace and CRLF from the received challenge\n- pins modern Surefire so the JUnit 5 suite actually executes\n\nValidation:\n- mvn -B -f VotifierPlus/pom.xml -Dtest=VoteReceiverTest test (27 tests)\n- mvn -B -f VotifierPlus/pom.xml clean package (80 tests)\n- JAR integrity and git diff --check\n\nFollow-up to #169.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Sep 8, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-09-08T01:28:37.386855Z 306b73e PR opened
🔒 Security Review ✅ Completed 2026-09-08T01:31:02.886327Z 306b73e PR opened
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@BenCodez
BenCodez merged commit ee01e6b into master Sep 8, 2026
1 check passed
@BenCodez
BenCodez deleted the test/votifierplus-169-regression branch September 8, 2026 01:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant