Replies: 2 comments
|
I really don't know what you're trying to say here. Some people like the feature, some people don't. You don't have to use it. |
0 replies
|
Sorry for my late reply. I wasn't aware of readability metrics prior to using Vale, so when I informed myself about them, they started to look more and more like something which merely adds a veneer of quantitative rigour to the otherwise artistic endeavour of gauging text quality. I just feel that a short cautionary note in the documentation would be helpful, that's all. Once again, thank you for your work on this project! |
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Hi,
Thanks @jdkato for open-sourcing this project!
I'm new to Vale and am positive about its customization options but I have some doubts regarding its support for readability metrics. For starters, this topic is controversial, as there's no consensus on a metric's ability to properly evaluate reading level. A 2014 study (secondary source) suggested Dale-Chall to be the most effective, yet from my understanding, Vale doesn't support it. Given that, I was wondering if Vale should even promote the use of other metrics if it doesn't support Dale-Chall.
All reactions