Idea: Flat-contract comparator for teams

[awdemos]

codeburn already gives users visibility into per-tool variable spend, which is great.

One idea that would make it even more useful for teams: a "flat-contract comparator" view. Let a user input their monthly bill across Cursor/Claude Code/Codex/etc., and show when they have crossed the threshold where a flat $399/mo hosted environment becomes cheaper and simpler to budget.

We run UltraWork (https://vibecodingagency.com/gpu-cloud/) on exactly that model, and the most common objection we hear is "but I already pay for Cursor/Claude." A side-by-side calculator would help people see the breakeven point honestly.

Disclosure: I run Vibe Coding Agency. Not trying to sell here, just suggesting a feature that would have helped our own conversations with customers.

[iamtoruk]

@awdemos, you asked for a team cost comparator and breakeven maths for an agency on flat-rate plans. That is a team-level question, and it is what CodeBurn Teams is being built to answer: every plan and every tool in one number, cost per merged PR, where the budget leaks, what worked and whether it spread, only aggregates leaving a machine. The CLI stays free; Teams is the paid part, and the beta costs nothing. What do you use today to compare cost across the agency, and what does it miss? https://codeburn.app/teams