Repository navigation
Single-folder vs Rule-per-folder #218
TomLucidor
started this conversation in
Ideas
Replies: 2 comments 8 replies
|
I'm not sure I understand the value of this, other than replicating the structure used by Cursor (and Copilot)? If there's a vendor-specific mechanism that you love using, why not just use that? My tendency now is to follow the AGENTS.md standard (and any additional widely adopted standards that emerge). Regardless of opinion (I actually like it better, but I can see how others might prefer the apply rules solution), if that's the emergent standard, it should be prioritised. |
8 replies
|
Side note: Skills/subagents probably have their own sharable formats now https://github.com/vercel-labs/add-skill |
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
This is a bit of a nitpick, but something worth considering. There are two ways of writing code files
.cursor/rules(or whichever IDE) capture a microcosm of what the file structure should look like, and then glob accordingly. This way we can have one single "power folder" that can be easily inserted into ANY new projects.1 is better than 2 in the long term, and it will be useful if it absorbs best practices. Maybe even we can have one "mother" folders for many sub-projects! Still, 2 can allow for minor tweaks in case 1 fails.
Reference to https://github.com/intellectronica/ruler?tab=readme-ov-file#nested-rule-loading
All reactions