Skip to content

comparison.md

Latest commit

 

History

History
37 lines (26 loc) · 3.41 KB

comparison.md

File metadata and controls

37 lines (26 loc) · 3.41 KB
Raw

How WinClean compares

An honest look at where WinClean fits, versus doing maintenance by hand and versus generic one-click "PC cleaners". The goal here is to help you decide whether it is the right tool, not to sell it.

Versus cleaning up by hand

Manual maintenance works, but it is easy to forget a step and easy to make a mistake. WinClean runs the same steps in one command, in a consistent order, with a restore point and a log.

By hand WinClean
Windows Update Open Settings, wait, repeat One phase, plus drivers
Browser caches Open each browser, each profile Seven browsers, multiple profiles, automatically
Dev tool caches Remember each cache path npm, pip, NuGet, Gradle, Cargo, Go, and more
Docker / WSL Rarely done Prune plus VHDX compaction
Disk Cleanup / DISM Separate tools Included, with before/after measurement
Safety Hope you did not delete the wrong thing Restore point, protected paths, dry run
Record of what happened None Timestamped log plus optional JSON summary

Versus generic one-click cleaners

Generic cleaners tend to optimize for a big "space freed" number and touch things a maintenance tool should leave alone. WinClean is deliberately narrower and more conservative.

  • Safety by design. A System Restore Point is attempted before the maintenance phases (and the run continues with a warning if it cannot be created). A fixed set of system roots is never accepted as a cleanup target, and path protection normalizes short names and .. traversal. -ReportOnly previews the actions without making maintenance changes. The one-command installers are fail-closed and verify a SHA256 hash before running the downloaded script.
  • Honest reporting. WinClean does not inflate results. Freed space is measured, not estimated from a category list. Operations that quietly do nothing say so instead of logging success. The optional result JSON reports each phase as Completed, Skipped, or Failed, and reports app updates as the number winget offered rather than a confirmed install count.
  • Developer-tool awareness. It cleans the caches developers actually accumulate (npm, pip, NuGet, Gradle, Cargo, Go, Docker, WSL, Visual Studio, VS Code, JetBrains) while preserving the package stores and project artifacts those tools depend on (node_modules, virtual environments, vendor, .nuget\packages). Generic cleaners usually miss the caches and sometimes delete the artifacts.
  • Verifiable. WinClean is a single open-source PowerShell script under the MIT license. Every release is run end-to-end on real Windows 11 VMs (ru-RU and en-US) and is covered by 300+ automated tests. You can read exactly what it does before running it.

Where WinClean is not the right tool

  • It is not a real-time or scheduled background cleaner. It runs when you run it.
  • It is not a registry "optimizer" or a tune-up suite. It does not promise speed gains from registry edits; the one registry-adjacent action is optional telemetry disabling behind -DisableTelemetry.
  • It is Windows-11-first. It works on much of Windows 10 with PowerShell 7.1+, but it is designed and verified for Windows 11.
  • It does not uninstall applications or manage startup items.

If you want a conservative, transparent, developer-aware maintenance script that you can audit and roll back, WinClean fits. If you want an always-on cleaner or a registry tuner, it is not that.